Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Janesville, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Janesville, IA.
Data | Farmington | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,566 | 1,050 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $114,737 | $88,625 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Janesville
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 1,050 in Janesville.
- The median age in Janesville is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $88,625 in Janesville.
- In Janesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Farmington and Janesville at 5%.
- Janesville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Janesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 85 | 99 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Janesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Janesville at 99% compared to 85% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Janesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 1% in Janesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 4% compared to 0% in Janesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Janesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Janesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 8.8% |
Depression | 22.6% | 18.4% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 22.5% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Janesville
- In Janesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 18.4% in Janesville.
- Janesville has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Janesville at 22.5% compared to 18.9% in Farmington.
- Janesville has higher obesity rates at 35.3% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Janesville at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Janesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 16.6% (174) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 2.7% (28) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 18.1% (190) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Janesville.
- In Janesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 2.7% in Janesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.