Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Hollister, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Hollister, CA.
Data | Farmington | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,566 | 44,218 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $114,737 | $95,764 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Hollister
- The population in Hollister is higher at 44,218, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Hollister.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $95,764 in Hollister.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Hollister.
- The poverty level is higher in Hollister at 12%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Hollister has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 85 | -1 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 66 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 29 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Hollister
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 1% in Hollister.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to -1% in Hollister.
- Both Farmington and Hollister have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Hollister has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 29%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
- In Hollister, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Hollister |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.0% |
Depression | 22.6% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 12.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 18.3% in Hollister.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 13.7% compared to 12.3% in Hollister.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Hollister.
- Hollister has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hollister at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Hollister |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 2.2% (952) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 14.8% (6,534) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 22.3% (9,855) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 10.1% (4,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hollister at 22.3%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 10.1% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.