Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Girdletree, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Girdletree, MD.

Data Farmington Girdletree
Population 23,566 122
Median Age 35.1 years 57.4 years
Median Income $114,737 $129,167
Married Families 41.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Farmington vs Girdletree

  • In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
  • The median age in Girdletree is higher at 57.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167, compared to $114,737 in Farmington.
  • In Girdletree, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 3.2%, compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs Girdletree provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington Girdletree
Black 3 Data is updating
White 85 89
Asian 3 11
Hispanic 5 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Girdletree

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Girdletree at 89% compared to 85% in Farmington.
  • In Girdletree, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Farmington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 4% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Girdletree at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington Girdletree
Mental Health Not Good 13.3% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 10.6%
Depression 22.6% 20.8%
Smoking 13.7% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 18.8%
Obesity 31.8% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Girdletree

  • In Girdletree, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 20.8% in Girdletree.
  • Girdletree has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Girdletree.
  • Girdletree has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Girdletree at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington Girdletree
No Schooling 0.4% (86) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.3% (2,674) 44.3% (54)
Less than High School 7.1% (1,662) 19.7% (24)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.4% (5,505) 5.7% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Girdletree

  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
  • In Girdletree, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 44.3% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Girdletree at 19.7%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.