Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Gilbert, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Gilbert, AZ.
| Data | Farmington | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,566 | 275,346 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $114,737 | $115,179 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Gilbert
- The population in Gilbert is higher at 275,346, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
- The median age in Gilbert is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179, compared to $114,737 in Farmington.
- In Gilbert, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Gilbert at 6%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Gilbert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 85 | 62 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- In Gilbert, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Farmington.
- Gilbert has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gilbert at 10%, compared to 4% in Farmington.
- In Gilbert, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 13.7% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 18.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 31.8% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gilbert at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.5% (1,279) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 8.1% (22,388) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 4.0% (10,945) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 28.4% (78,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 11.3% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- In Gilbert, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 23.4% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.