Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Farmington | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,566 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $114,737 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Flomaton
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 38 |
| White | 85 | 58 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- Both Farmington and Flomaton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 22.6% in Farmington.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.