Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Fairfield, AL.
Data | Farmington | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,566 | 9,690 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 30.7 years |
Median Income | $114,737 | $45,646 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Fairfield
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Farmington have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 41.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 95 |
White | 85 | 3 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 4% compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 14.2% |
Depression | 22.6% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 11.7% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 48.1% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 48.1% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.5% (53) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 22.3% (2,159) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 3.1% (302) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Farmington.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.