Demographics details for Farmington, MN vs Bennington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MN vs Bennington, NE.
Data | Farmington | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,566 | 1,983 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $114,737 | $94,444 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Bennington
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 23,566, compared to 1,983 in Bennington.
- The median age in Bennington is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737 compared to $94,444 in Bennington.
- In Bennington, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Bennington.
- The unemployment rate in Farmington is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.6% in Bennington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Bennington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 85 | 93 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Bennington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 3% compared to 0% in Bennington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bennington at 93% compared to 85% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 3% compared to 1% in Bennington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 3% in Bennington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington at 4% compared to 3% in Bennington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Bennington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 7.1% |
Depression | 22.6% | 19.1% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 10.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 23.4% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Bennington
- More residents in Farmington report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 12.3% in Bennington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Farmington at 22.6% compared to 19.1% in Bennington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmington at 13.7% compared to 10.6% in Bennington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bennington at 23.4% compared to 18.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 31.8% compared to 31.0% in Bennington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bennington at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Bennington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (86) | 0.1% (2) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (2,674) | 19.0% (376) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (1,662) | 7.7% (153) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (5,505) | 31.5% (624) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Bennington
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Bennington.
- In Bennington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bennington at 7.7%, compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Bennington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 23.4% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.