Demographics details for Farmington, CT vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, CT vs Washington, NC.
Data | Farmington | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,340 | 10,828 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 48.0 years |
Median Income | $101,000 | $38,927 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Washington
- In Farmington, the population is higher at 25,340, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 42.0 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $101,000 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 65.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 3% in Farmington.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.0% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 49 |
White | 85 | 41 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 3%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 22.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 0.0% in Farmington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (128) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.0% (2,058) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.7% (1,487) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.