Demographics details for Farmington, CT vs Binford, ND

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, CT vs Binford, ND.

Data Farmington Binford
Population 25,340 163
Median Age 42.0 years 42.5 years
Median Income $101,000 $46,250
Married Families 65.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 3% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.0 2.5

Population Comparison: Farmington vs Binford

  • In Farmington, the population is higher at 25,340, compared to 163 in Binford.
  • The median age in Binford is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 42.0 years in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $101,000 compared to $46,250 in Binford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 65.0% compared to 33.0% in Binford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Binford at 10%, compared to 3% in Farmington.
  • Binford has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 2.0% in Farmington.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington vs Binford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington Binford
Black 5 Data is updating
White 85 94
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Binford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Binford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Binford at 94% compared to 85% in Farmington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington at 5% compared to 0% in Binford.
  • Binford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • Both Farmington and Binford have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Binford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington Binford
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.8%
Depression Data is updating% 20.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 21.9%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Binford

  • In Binford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Binford at 20.1% versus 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Binford has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Binford at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Binford has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Binford at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington Binford
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.9% (39)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.0% (18)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.2% (28)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Binford

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Farmington and Binford at 0.0%.
  • In Binford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Binford at 11.0%, compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • In Binford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.