Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Wauconda, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Wauconda, IL.

Data Farmington hills Wauconda
Population 82,737 13,932
Median Age 41.6 years 36.8 years
Median Income $101,728 $108,229
Married Families 44.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Wauconda

  • In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 13,932 in Wauconda.
  • Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 36.8 years in Wauconda.
  • Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229, compared to $101,728 in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Wauconda.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wauconda at 8%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • Wauconda has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Wauconda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Wauconda
Black 18 1
White 59 66
Asian 15 6
Hispanic 2 18
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Wauconda

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wauconda at 66% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 6% in Wauconda.
  • Wauconda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wauconda at 9%, compared to 6% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Wauconda at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Wauconda
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 9.2%
Depression 19.0% 18.8%
Smoking 11.4% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.8%
Obesity 29.1% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Wauconda

  • In Wauconda, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Farmington hills at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Wauconda.
  • Wauconda has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 17.5% in Farmington hills.
  • Wauconda has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Farmington hills at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Wauconda
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 1.4% (202)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 10.5% (1,456)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 10.2% (1,425)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 26.0% (3,623)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Wauconda

  • In Wauconda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
  • In Wauconda, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wauconda at 10.2%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 26.0% in Wauconda.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.