Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Piqua, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Piqua, OH.
Data | Farmington hills | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,737 | 20,607 |
Median Age | 41.6 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $101,728 | $55,379 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Piqua
- In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 20,607 in Piqua.
- Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 37.9 years in Piqua.
- Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $55,379 in Piqua.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Piqua.
- The poverty level is higher in Piqua at 10%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
- Piqua has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington hills vs Piqua provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington hills | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 2 |
White | 59 | 92 |
Asian | 15 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Piqua
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 2% in Piqua.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piqua at 92% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 1% in Piqua.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmington hills at 2% compared to 1% in Piqua.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington hills at 6% compared to 4% in Piqua.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Piqua at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington hills | Piqua |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 13.1% |
Depression | 19.0% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 29.1% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Piqua
- In Piqua, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piqua at 23.9% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
- Piqua has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 17.2% in Piqua.
- Piqua has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piqua at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington hills | Piqua |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (488) | 0.5% (109) |
High School Diploma | 9.5% (7,900) | 24.5% (5,047) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (4,947) | 13.5% (2,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.2% (34,948) | 8.9% (1,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Piqua
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Piqua.
- In Piqua, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Piqua at 13.5%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 8.9% in Piqua.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.