Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Oologah, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Oologah, OK.

Data Farmington hills Oologah
Population 82,737 1,314
Median Age 41.6 years 33.1 years
Median Income $101,728 $82,531
Married Families 44.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 5% 7%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Oologah

  • In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 1,314 in Oologah.
  • Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 33.1 years in Oologah.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $82,531 in Oologah.
  • In Oologah, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in Farmington hills.
  • The poverty level is higher in Oologah at 7%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • Oologah has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Oologah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Oologah
Black 18 Data is updating
White 59 55
Asian 15 1
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 6 17
American Indian Data is updating 24

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Oologah

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 0% in Oologah.
  • Farmington hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 55% in Oologah.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 1% in Oologah.
  • Oologah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oologah at 17%, compared to 6% in Farmington hills.
  • In Oologah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 24%, compared to 0% in Farmington hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Oologah
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 12.0%
Depression 19.0% 25.1%
Smoking 11.4% 19.1%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 15.5%
Obesity 29.1% 43.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 29.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Oologah

  • In Oologah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Oologah at 25.1% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Oologah has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 15.5% in Oologah.
  • Oologah has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oologah at 29.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Oologah
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 0.4% (5)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 22.6% (297)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 14.5% (190)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 13.8% (181)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Oologah

  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Oologah.
  • In Oologah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oologah at 14.5%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 13.8% in Oologah.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.