Or Compare Two Places

Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Mercer, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Mercer, PA.

Data Farmington hills Mercer
Population 82,737 109,220
Median Age 41.6 years 45.0 years
Median Income $101,728 $57,353
Married Families 44.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 4.2

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mercer

  • The population in Mercer is higher at 109,220, compared to 82,737 in Farmington hills.
  • The median age in Mercer is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 41.6 years in Farmington hills.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $57,353 in Mercer.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 42.0% in Mercer.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mercer at 10%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • Mercer has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Mercer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Mercer
Black 18 6
White 59 87
Asian 15 1
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mercer

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 6% in Mercer.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mercer at 87% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 1% in Mercer.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Mercer at 2%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington hills at 6% compared to 4% in Mercer.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Mercer at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Mercer
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 12.1%
Depression 19.0% 23.7%
Smoking 11.4% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.5%
Obesity 29.1% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mercer

  • In Mercer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mercer at 23.7% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Mercer has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mercer at 18.5% compared to 17.5% in Farmington hills.
  • Mercer has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mercer at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Mercer
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 0.6% (662)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 26.5% (28,924)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 13.0% (14,161)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 17.4% (19,021)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mercer

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Farmington hills and Mercer at 0.6%.
  • In Mercer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mercer at 13.0%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 17.4% in Mercer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.