Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Mcpherson, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Mcpherson, KS.

Data Farmington hills Mcpherson
Population 82,737 13,865
Median Age 41.6 years 36.2 years
Median Income $101,728 $69,807
Married Families 44.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 9%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.3

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mcpherson

  • In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
  • Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • Mcpherson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Mcpherson
Black 18 2
White 59 87
Asian 15 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mcpherson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington hills at 6% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Mcpherson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Mcpherson
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 9.7%
Depression 19.0% 20.1%
Smoking 11.4% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.2%
Obesity 29.1% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mcpherson

  • In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mcpherson at 20.1% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.5% in Farmington hills.
  • Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Mcpherson
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 0.3% (48)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 12.8% (1,775)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 5.8% (804)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 21.7% (3,010)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Mcpherson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
  • In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents in Farmington hills have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.