Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Farmington hills | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,737 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $101,728 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Gallatin
- In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
- Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington hills vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmington hills | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 15 |
| White | 59 | 67 |
| Asian | 15 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
- The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 6% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmington hills | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 29.1% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Farmington hills and Gallatin at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmington hills | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (488) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (7,900) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (4,947) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.2% (34,948) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
- In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.