Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Burns, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Burns, KS.

Data Farmington hills Burns
Population 82,737 237
Median Age 41.6 years 26.5 years
Median Income $101,728 $43,125
Married Families 44.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 5% 14%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 2.6

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Burns

  • In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 237 in Burns.
  • Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
  • The poverty level is higher in Burns at 14%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Farmington hills is higher at 2.8%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Burns
Black 18 Data is updating
White 59 92
Asian 15 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 6 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Burns

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Farmington hills at 18% compared to 0% in Burns.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 0% in Burns.
  • Burns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Farmington hills at 6% compared to 2% in Burns.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Burns at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Burns
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 9.6%
Depression 19.0% 21.2%
Smoking 11.4% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 19.2%
Obesity 29.1% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Burns

  • In Burns, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Burns at 21.2% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Burns has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Farmington hills.
  • Burns has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Burns
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 13.9% (33)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 43.0% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 6.3% (15)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Burns

  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
  • In Burns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 6.3% in Burns.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.