Demographics details for Farmington hills, MI vs Brenham, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Farmington hills, MI vs Brenham, TX.

Data Farmington hills Brenham
Population 82,737 18,469
Median Age 41.6 years 32.4 years
Median Income $101,728 $52,664
Married Families 44.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Farmington hills vs Brenham

  • In Farmington hills, the population is higher at 82,737, compared to 18,469 in Brenham.
  • Residents in Farmington hills have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 32.4 years in Brenham.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728 compared to $52,664 in Brenham.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington hills at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Brenham.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brenham at 13%, compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • Brenham has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Farmington hills vs Brenham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Farmington hills Brenham
Black 18 25
White 59 42
Asian 15 1
Hispanic 2 23
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Brenham

  • In Brenham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
  • Farmington hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 42% in Brenham.
  • The Asian population is larger in Farmington hills at 15% compared to 1% in Brenham.
  • Brenham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brenham at 9%, compared to 6% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington hills and Brenham at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Farmington hills Brenham
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 11.7%
Depression 19.0% 23.0%
Smoking 11.4% 17.1%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 17.9%
Obesity 29.1% 37.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington hills vs Brenham

  • In Brenham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Brenham at 23.0% versus 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Brenham has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Brenham at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Farmington hills.
  • Brenham has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brenham at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Farmington hills Brenham
No Schooling 0.6% (488) 1.1% (199)
High School Diploma 9.5% (7,900) 13.9% (2,562)
Less than High School 6.0% (4,947) 12.3% (2,274)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (34,948) 15.6% (2,872)

Education Levels Comparison: Farmington hills vs Brenham

  • In Brenham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
  • In Brenham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brenham at 12.3%, compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 15.6% in Brenham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.