Demographics details for Farmersburg, IA vs Richton, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmersburg, IA vs Richton, MS.
| Data | Farmersburg | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 268 | 902 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $46,641 | $33,621 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Farmersburg vs Richton
- The population in Richton is higher at 902, compared to 268 in Farmersburg.
- The median age in Richton is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 35.7 years in Farmersburg.
- Farmersburg has a higher median income of $46,641 compared to $33,621 in Richton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmersburg at 56.0% compared to 35.0% in Richton.
- The poverty level is higher in Richton at 16%, compared to 10% in Farmersburg.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Farmersburg and Richton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Farmersburg vs Richton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Farmersburg | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 32 |
| White | 94 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmersburg vs Richton
- In Richton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
- Farmersburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 68% in Richton.
- Both Farmersburg and Richton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Farmersburg at 2% compared to 0% in Richton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Farmersburg at 4% compared to 0% in Richton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmersburg and Richton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Farmersburg | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 42.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmersburg vs Richton
- In Richton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in Farmersburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richton at 24.4% versus 19.3% in Farmersburg.
- Richton has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 20.2% in Farmersburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmersburg at 21.7% compared to 13.2% in Richton.
- Richton has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 40.5% in Farmersburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richton at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmersburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Farmersburg | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (2) | 4.2% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 37.7% (101) | 26.9% (243) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (56) | 19.7% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (14) | 15.2% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmersburg vs Richton
- In Richton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.7% in Farmersburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmersburg hold a high school diploma at 37.7% compared to 26.9% in Richton.
- More residents in Farmersburg have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 19.7% in Richton.
- In Richton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 5.2% in Farmersburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.