Demographics details for Farmersburg, IA vs Boulder, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmersburg, IA vs Boulder, CO.
Data | Farmersburg | Boulder |
---|---|---|
Population | 268 | 105,485 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 28.5 years |
Median Income | $46,641 | $80,243 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Farmersburg vs Boulder
- The population in Boulder is higher at 105,485, compared to 268 in Farmersburg.
- Residents in Farmersburg have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 28.5 years in Boulder.
- Boulder has a higher median income of $80,243, compared to $46,641 in Farmersburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmersburg at 56.0% compared to 28.0% in Boulder.
- The poverty level is higher in Boulder at 12%, compared to 10% in Farmersburg.
- Boulder has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Farmersburg.
Demographics
Demographics Farmersburg vs Boulder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmersburg | Boulder |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 94 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Farmersburg vs Boulder
- In Boulder, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
- Farmersburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 74% in Boulder.
- In Boulder, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Farmersburg.
- Boulder has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Farmersburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Boulder at 7%, compared to 4% in Farmersburg.
- In Boulder, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmersburg | Boulder |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 8.9% |
Depression | 19.3% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 10.9% |
Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 17.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmersburg vs Boulder
- More residents in Farmersburg report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Boulder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Boulder at 23.3% versus 19.3% in Farmersburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Farmersburg at 20.2% compared to 10.9% in Boulder.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmersburg at 21.7% compared to 19.5% in Boulder.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmersburg at 40.5% compared to 17.5% in Boulder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Farmersburg at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Boulder.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmersburg | Boulder |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (2) | 0.3% (324) |
High School Diploma | 37.7% (101) | 2.9% (3,026) |
Less than High School | 20.9% (56) | 3.3% (3,521) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (14) | 43.6% (46,028) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmersburg vs Boulder
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmersburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Boulder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmersburg hold a high school diploma at 37.7% compared to 2.9% in Boulder.
- More residents in Farmersburg have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 3.3% in Boulder.
- In Boulder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.6% compared to 5.2% in Farmersburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.