Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs South cle elum, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs South cle elum, WA.

Data Faribault South cle elum
Population 24,518 564
Median Age 38.7 years 35.2 years
Median Income $58,881 $56,400
Married Families 33.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Faribault vs South cle elum

  • In Faribault, the population is higher at 24,518, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in Faribault have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • Faribault has a higher median income of $58,881 compared to $56,400 in South cle elum.
  • In South cle elum, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Faribault.
  • The poverty level is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 8% in Faribault.
  • South cle elum has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Faribault.

Demographics

Demographics Faribault vs South cle elum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Faribault South cle elum
Black 15 Data is updating
White 64 84
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 14 6
Two or More Races 5 10
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faribault at 15% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South cle elum at 84% compared to 64% in Faribault.
  • The Asian population is larger in Faribault at 1% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Faribault at 14% compared to 6% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Faribault at 1% compared to 0% in South cle elum.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Faribault South cle elum
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 11.9%
Depression 21.0% 26.2%
Smoking 21.6% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 18.3%
Obesity 40.0% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs South cle elum

  • In South cle elum, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South cle elum at 26.2% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Faribault.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Faribault at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Faribault South cle elum
No Schooling 2.1% (513) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.3% (5,456) 22.2% (125)
Less than High School 14.1% (3,450) 21.6% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (2,982) 20.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 22.2% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South cle elum at 21.6%, compared to 14.1% in Faribault.
  • In South cle elum, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.