Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Faribault | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,518 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,881 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Pea ridge
- In Faribault, the population is higher at 24,518, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- Residents in Faribault have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $58,881 in Faribault.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Faribault.
- The poverty level is identical in both Faribault and Pea ridge at 8%.
- Pea ridge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Faribault | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 4 |
| White | 64 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Faribault at 15% compared to 4% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pea ridge at 70% compared to 64% in Faribault.
- Both Faribault and Pea ridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Faribault at 14% compared to 9% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Faribault and Pea ridge at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Faribault | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pea ridge at 25.0% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Pea ridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Faribault at 40.0% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pea ridge at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Faribault | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 17.7% in Pea ridge.
- More residents in Faribault have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.