Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Corsicana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Corsicana, TX.
Data | Faribault | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,518 | 25,566 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 34.6 years |
Median Income | $58,881 | $49,353 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Corsicana
- The population in Corsicana is higher at 25,566, compared to 24,518 in Faribault.
- Residents in Faribault have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 34.6 years in Corsicana.
- Faribault has a higher median income of $58,881 compared to $49,353 in Corsicana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Faribault at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Corsicana.
- The poverty level is higher in Corsicana at 14%, compared to 8% in Faribault.
- Corsicana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Corsicana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Faribault | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 17 |
White | 64 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 15% in Faribault.
- Faribault has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
- Both Faribault and Corsicana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Corsicana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 14% in Faribault.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corsicana at 10%, compared to 5% in Faribault.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Faribault at 1% compared to 0% in Corsicana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Faribault | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 13.6% |
Depression | 21.0% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Corsicana at 23.5% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 19.9% in Corsicana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 40.0% in Faribault.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corsicana at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Faribault.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Faribault | Corsicana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 3.7% (957) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 14.2% (3,633) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 25.3% (6,461) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 9.2% (2,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.1% in Faribault.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corsicana at 25.3%, compared to 14.1% in Faribault.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.