Demographics details for Faribault, MN vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Faribault, MN vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Faribault | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,518 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,881 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Faribault vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 24,518 in Faribault.
- Residents in Faribault have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Faribault has a higher median income of $58,881 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Faribault at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 8% in Faribault.
- The unemployment rate in Faribault is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Faribault vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Faribault | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 17 |
| White | 64 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Faribault vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 15% in Faribault.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Auburn at 69% compared to 64% in Faribault.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Faribault.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Faribault at 14% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Faribault at 5% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Faribault at 1% compared to 0% in Auburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Faribault | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Faribault vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.5% in Faribault.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 21.0% in Faribault.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Faribault at 21.6% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Faribault at 40.0% compared to 38.7% in Auburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Faribault at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Faribault | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (513) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (5,456) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (3,450) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,982) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Faribault vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Faribault hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Faribault have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.