Demographics details for Fancy farm, KY vs Jasper, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fancy farm, KY vs Jasper, TX.
| Data | Fancy farm | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 300 | 7,423 |
| Median Age | 51.1 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,060 | $38,796 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fancy farm vs Jasper
- The population in Jasper is higher at 7,423, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- Residents in Fancy farm have a higher median age of 51.1 years compared to 37.6 years in Jasper.
- Fancy farm has a higher median income of $55,060 compared to $38,796 in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fancy farm at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Jasper.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 17%, compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- Jasper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Fancy farm vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fancy farm | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 41 |
| White | 91 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fancy farm vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 3% in Fancy farm.
- Fancy farm has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 46% in Jasper.
- Both Fancy farm and Jasper have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Jasper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fancy farm at 6% compared to 5% in Jasper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fancy farm and Jasper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fancy farm | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fancy farm vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.9% in Fancy farm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fancy farm at 27.3% compared to 23.4% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 20.6% in Fancy farm.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Jasper.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 37.4% in Fancy farm.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fancy farm.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fancy farm | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 47.7% (143) | 26.8% (1,987) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (16) | 8.8% (653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (43) | 8.0% (591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fancy farm vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fancy farm hold a high school diploma at 47.7% compared to 26.8% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jasper at 8.8%, compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fancy farm hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 8.0% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.