Demographics details for Falls city, NE vs Mikado, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls city, NE vs Mikado, MI.
Data | Falls city | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,052 | 820 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $40,222 | $46,250 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Falls city vs Mikado
- In Falls city, the population is higher at 4,052, compared to 820 in Mikado.
- The median age in Mikado is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 40.6 years in Falls city.
- Mikado has a higher median income of $46,250, compared to $40,222 in Falls city.
- In Mikado, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Falls city.
- Falls city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Mikado.
- Mikado has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Falls city.
Demographics
Demographics Falls city vs Mikado provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Falls city | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 91 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | 3 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Falls city vs Mikado
- In Mikado, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Falls city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mikado at 92% compared to 91% in Falls city.
- Both Falls city and Mikado have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Falls city and Mikado at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Falls city at 5% compared to 3% in Mikado.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Falls city at 3% compared to 2% in Mikado.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Falls city | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 43.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls city vs Mikado
- More residents in Falls city report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Depression is more prevalent in Falls city at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Falls city at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Binge drinking is more common in Falls city at 20.4% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Obesity rates are higher in Falls city at 43.9% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mikado at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Falls city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Falls city | Mikado |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (6) |
High School Diploma | 26.2% (1,063) | 24.5% (201) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (349) | 12.7% (104) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (598) | 6.1% (50) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls city vs Mikado
- In Mikado, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Falls city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls city hold a high school diploma at 26.2% compared to 24.5% in Mikado.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mikado at 12.7%, compared to 8.6% in Falls city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 6.1% in Mikado.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.