Demographics details for Falls city, NE vs Eastman, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls city, NE vs Eastman, GA.
Data | Falls city | Eastman |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,052 | 5,616 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 38.5 years |
Median Income | $40,222 | $41,213 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Falls city vs Eastman
- The population in Eastman is higher at 5,616, compared to 4,052 in Falls city.
- Residents in Falls city have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 38.5 years in Eastman.
- Eastman has a higher median income of $41,213, compared to $40,222 in Falls city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls city at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Eastman.
- The poverty level is higher in Eastman at 21%, compared to 13% in Falls city.
- Eastman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Falls city.
Demographics
Demographics Falls city vs Eastman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Falls city | Eastman |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 22 |
White | 91 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Falls city vs Eastman
- In Eastman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Falls city.
- Falls city has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 69% in Eastman.
- Both Falls city and Eastman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Eastman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Falls city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Falls city at 5% compared to 1% in Eastman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Falls city at 3% compared to 0% in Eastman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Falls city | Eastman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.6% |
Depression | 17.2% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 19.3% | 21.0% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 43.9% | 37.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls city vs Eastman
- In Eastman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in Falls city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eastman at 22.1% versus 17.2% in Falls city.
- Eastman has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Falls city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Falls city at 20.4% compared to 14.7% in Eastman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Falls city at 43.9% compared to 37.5% in Eastman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eastman at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Falls city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Falls city | Eastman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (44) |
High School Diploma | 26.2% (1,063) | 16.8% (942) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (349) | 13.4% (750) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (598) | 14.7% (824) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls city vs Eastman
- In Eastman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Falls city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls city hold a high school diploma at 26.2% compared to 16.8% in Eastman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eastman at 13.4%, compared to 8.6% in Falls city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Eastman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.