Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Tionesta, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Tionesta, PA.

Data Falls church Tionesta
Population 14,586 422
Median Age 38.8 years 62.2 years
Median Income $164,536 $44,583
Married Families 43.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Falls church vs Tionesta

  • In Falls church, the population is higher at 14,586, compared to 422 in Tionesta.
  • The median age in Tionesta is higher at 62.2 years, compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $44,583 in Tionesta.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Tionesta.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tionesta at 10%, compared to 6% in Falls church.
  • Tionesta has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.

Demographics

Demographics Falls church vs Tionesta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falls church Tionesta
Black 5 Data is updating
White 65 100
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 Data is updating
Two or More Races 10 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Tionesta

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 0% in Tionesta.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Tionesta at 100% compared to 65% in Falls church.
  • The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 0% in Tionesta.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Falls church at 11% compared to 0% in Tionesta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Falls church at 10% compared to 0% in Tionesta.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and Tionesta at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falls church Tionesta
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 6.5% 13.2%
Depression 19.9% 25.3%
Smoking 7.5% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 17.4%
Obesity 30.8% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 37.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Tionesta

  • In Tionesta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tionesta at 25.3% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
  • Tionesta has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Tionesta.
  • Tionesta has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tionesta at 37.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falls church Tionesta
No Schooling 0.3% (50) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 4.1% (597) 43.1% (182)
Less than High School 2.7% (388) 7.1% (30)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.5% (7,660) 11.1% (47)

Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Tionesta

  • A higher percentage of residents in Falls church have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Tionesta.
  • In Tionesta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 43.1% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tionesta at 7.1%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 11.1% in Tionesta.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.