Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Three oaks, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Three oaks, MI.

Data Falls church Three oaks
Population 14,586 1,397
Median Age 38.8 years 40.4 years
Median Income $164,536 $57,083
Married Families 43.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 2.9

Population Comparison: Falls church vs Three oaks

  • In Falls church, the population is higher at 14,586, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
  • The median age in Three oaks is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
  • The poverty level is higher in Three oaks at 12%, compared to 6% in Falls church.
  • Three oaks has a higher unemployment rate at 2.9% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.

Demographics

Demographics Falls church vs Three oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falls church Three oaks
Black 5 Data is updating
White 65 52
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 11 26
Two or More Races 10 21
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Three oaks

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
  • Falls church has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 52% in Three oaks.
  • The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 1% in Three oaks.
  • Three oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 11% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Three oaks at 21%, compared to 10% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and Three oaks at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falls church Three oaks
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 6.5% 10.8%
Depression 19.9% 25.3%
Smoking 7.5% 17.8%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 19.4%
Obesity 30.8% 35.0%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Three oaks

  • In Three oaks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Three oaks at 25.3% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
  • Three oaks has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 18.8% in Falls church.
  • Three oaks has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Three oaks at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falls church Three oaks
No Schooling 0.3% (50) 1.8% (25)
High School Diploma 4.1% (597) 16.2% (226)
Less than High School 2.7% (388) 8.2% (114)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.5% (7,660) 12.2% (171)

Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Three oaks

  • In Three oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
  • In Three oaks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Three oaks at 8.2%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.