Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Saucier, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Saucier, MS.
| Data | Falls church | Saucier |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,586 | 1,199 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $164,536 | $67,742 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Falls church vs Saucier
- In Falls church, the population is higher at 14,586, compared to 1,199 in Saucier.
- The median age in Saucier is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $67,742 in Saucier.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Saucier.
- The poverty level is higher in Saucier at 11%, compared to 6% in Falls church.
- Saucier has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Falls church vs Saucier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Falls church | Saucier |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 65 | 100 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Saucier
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Saucier at 100% compared to 65% in Falls church.
- The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Falls church at 11% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Falls church at 10% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and Saucier at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Falls church | Saucier |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.5% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Saucier
- In Saucier, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Saucier at 25.6% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
- Saucier has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- Binge drinking is more common in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 16.3% in Saucier.
- Saucier has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saucier at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Falls church | Saucier |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (50) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.1% (597) | 29.9% (359) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (388) | 6.3% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 52.5% (7,660) | 7.0% (84) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Saucier
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Saucier.
- In Saucier, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Saucier at 6.3%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 7.0% in Saucier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.