Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Livingston, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Livingston, TX.

Data Falls church Livingston
Population 14,586 5,784
Median Age 38.8 years 36.9 years
Median Income $164,536 $47,952
Married Families 43.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Falls church vs Livingston

  • In Falls church, the population is higher at 14,586, compared to 5,784 in Livingston.
  • Residents in Falls church have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.9 years in Livingston.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $47,952 in Livingston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Livingston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 12%, compared to 6% in Falls church.
  • Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.

Demographics

Demographics Falls church vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falls church Livingston
Black 5 18
White 65 38
Asian 9 2
Hispanic 11 29
Two or More Races 10 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 5% in Falls church.
  • Falls church has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 38% in Livingston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 2% in Livingston.
  • Livingston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 11% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livingston at 13%, compared to 10% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and Livingston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falls church Livingston
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 6.5% 13.1%
Depression 19.9% 24.1%
Smoking 7.5% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 17.9%
Obesity 30.8% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Livingston at 24.1% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
  • Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 17.9% in Livingston.
  • Livingston has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falls church Livingston
No Schooling 0.3% (50) 2.1% (123)
High School Diploma 4.1% (597) 20.7% (1,198)
Less than High School 2.7% (388) 22.3% (1,289)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.5% (7,660) 9.0% (518)

Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
  • In Livingston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Livingston at 22.3%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 9.0% in Livingston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.