Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Lakeville, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Lakeville, MN.
Data | Falls church | Lakeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,586 | 74,553 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.5 years |
Median Income | $164,536 | $129,069 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Falls church vs Lakeville
- The population in Lakeville is higher at 74,553, compared to 14,586 in Falls church.
- Residents in Falls church have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.5 years in Lakeville.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $129,069 in Lakeville.
- In Lakeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 4% in Lakeville.
- Lakeville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Falls church vs Lakeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Falls church | Lakeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 4 |
White | 65 | 80 |
Asian | 9 | 6 |
Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Lakeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 4% in Lakeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lakeville at 80% compared to 65% in Falls church.
- The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 6% in Lakeville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Falls church at 11% compared to 5% in Lakeville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Falls church at 10% compared to 5% in Lakeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and Lakeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Falls church | Lakeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Depression | 19.9% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 7.5% | 11.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 30.8% | 30.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Lakeville
- In Lakeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.3% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lakeville at 21.6% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
- Lakeville has a higher smoking rate at 11.7% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lakeville at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Falls church.
- Obesity rates are higher in Falls church at 30.8% compared to 30.3% in Lakeville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Falls church and Lakeville at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Falls church | Lakeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (50) | 0.5% (366) |
High School Diploma | 4.1% (597) | 8.9% (6,669) |
Less than High School | 2.7% (388) | 3.1% (2,337) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 52.5% (7,660) | 30.5% (22,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Lakeville
- In Lakeville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
- In Lakeville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.9% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lakeville at 3.1%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 30.5% in Lakeville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.