Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Falls church | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,586 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $164,536 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Falls church vs Fairfield
- In Falls church, the population is higher at 14,586, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 6% in Falls church.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Falls church vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Falls church | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 8 |
| White | 65 | 73 |
| Asian | 9 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Falls church.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 65% in Falls church.
- Both Falls church and Fairfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 9%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Falls church at 11% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Falls church at 10% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Falls church.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Falls church | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield at 20.1% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 18.8% in Falls church.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Falls church | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (50) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 4.1% (597) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (388) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 52.5% (7,660) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 6.3%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 38.1% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.