Demographics details for Falls church, VA vs American fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falls church, VA vs American fork, UT.

Data Falls church American fork
Population 14,586 37,268
Median Age 38.8 years 28.0 years
Median Income $164,536 $90,490
Married Families 43.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Falls church vs American fork

  • The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 14,586 in Falls church.
  • Residents in Falls church have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536 compared to $90,490 in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Falls church at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in American fork.
  • Falls church has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Falls church.

Demographics

Demographics Falls church vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falls church American fork
Black 5 Data is updating
White 65 84
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 11 9
Two or More Races 10 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falls church vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falls church at 5% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 65% in Falls church.
  • The Asian population is larger in Falls church at 9% compared to 1% in American fork.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Falls church at 11% compared to 9% in American fork.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Falls church at 10% compared to 6% in American fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falls church and American fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falls church American fork
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 6.5% 9.8%
Depression 19.9% 23.4%
Smoking 7.5% 6.7%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 8.5%
Obesity 30.8% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falls church vs American fork

  • In American fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 19.9% in Falls church.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Falls church at 7.5% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Falls church at 30.8% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in American fork at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falls church American fork
No Schooling 0.3% (50) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 4.1% (597) 7.4% (2,742)
Less than High School 2.7% (388) 5.7% (2,134)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.5% (7,660) 21.3% (7,922)

Education Levels Comparison: Falls church vs American fork

  • In American fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
  • In American fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in American fork at 5.7%, compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falls church hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 21.3% in American fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.