Demographics details for Falling waters, WV vs Woodbury, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falling waters, WV vs Woodbury, VT.

Data Falling waters Woodbury
Population 2,150 887
Median Age 32.2 years 46.0 years
Median Income $84,038 $75,000
Married Families 29.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.0

Population Comparison: Falling waters vs Woodbury

  • In Falling waters, the population is higher at 2,150, compared to 887 in Woodbury.
  • The median age in Woodbury is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038 compared to $75,000 in Woodbury.
  • In Woodbury, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Woodbury.
  • The unemployment rate in Falling waters is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.0% in Woodbury.

Demographics

Demographics Falling waters vs Woodbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falling waters Woodbury
Black 6 Data is updating
White 92 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falling waters vs Woodbury

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Falling waters at 6% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbury at 95% compared to 92% in Falling waters.
  • In Woodbury, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Falling waters.
  • Woodbury has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Falling waters at 2% compared to 1% in Woodbury.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falling waters and Woodbury at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falling waters Woodbury
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% Data is updating%
Depression 25.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 24.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falling waters vs Woodbury

  • More residents in Falling waters report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Falling waters at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Falling waters at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Falling waters at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Falling waters at 37.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Falling waters at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falling waters Woodbury
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.4% (482) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 4.7% (102) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (237) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Falling waters vs Woodbury

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Falling waters and Woodbury at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falling waters hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • More residents in Falling waters have less than a high school education at 4.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falling waters hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.