Demographics details for Falling waters, WV vs Mendenhall, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Falling waters, WV vs Mendenhall, MS.

Data Falling waters Mendenhall
Population 2,150 2,148
Median Age 32.2 years 39.0 years
Median Income $84,038 $35,956
Married Families 29.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 9% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.5

Population Comparison: Falling waters vs Mendenhall

  • In Falling waters, the population is higher at 2,150, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
  • The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 9% in Falling waters.
  • Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Falling waters.

Demographics

Demographics Falling waters vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Falling waters Mendenhall
Black 6 65
White 92 34
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Falling waters vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 6% in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • Both Falling waters and Mendenhall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Falling waters and Mendenhall at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Falling waters at 2% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falling waters and Mendenhall at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Falling waters Mendenhall
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 14.6%
Depression 25.7% 24.8%
Smoking 18.7% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 13.7%
Obesity 37.6% 46.3%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Falling waters vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.5% in Falling waters.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Falling waters at 25.7% compared to 24.8% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 18.7% in Falling waters.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Falling waters at 15.2% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 37.6% in Falling waters.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 24.0% in Falling waters.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Falling waters Mendenhall
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (16)
High School Diploma 22.4% (482) 17.9% (385)
Less than High School 4.7% (102) 20.7% (445)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (237) 18.4% (395)

Education Levels Comparison: Falling waters vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Falling waters.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Falling waters hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 4.7% in Falling waters.
  • In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.0% in Falling waters.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.