Demographics details for Fall river, MA vs Sanford, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river, MA vs Sanford, FL.
| Data | Fall river | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,682 | 63,154 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,734 | $59,181 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fall river vs Sanford
- In Fall river, the population is higher at 93,682, compared to 63,154 in Sanford.
- Residents in Fall river have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $59,181, compared to $52,734 in Fall river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fall river at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Fall river has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Sanford.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fall river | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 26 |
| White | 68 | 31 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river vs Sanford
- In Sanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 6% in Fall river.
- Fall river has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Fall river.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 12% in Fall river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 13%, compared to 11% in Fall river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fall river and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fall river | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river vs Sanford
- More residents in Fall river report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fall river at 25.0% compared to 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fall river at 23.0% compared to 19.9% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fall river at 16.7% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Sanford has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 32.8% in Fall river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fall river at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fall river | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (2,365) | 0.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (18,187) | 19.0% (11,984) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (30,324) | 11.1% (7,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (10,601) | 16.9% (10,683) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Sanford.
- More residents in Fall river have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.3% in Fall river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.