Demographics details for Fall river, MA vs Pequot lakes, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river, MA vs Pequot lakes, MN.
Data | Fall river | Pequot lakes |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,682 | 2,440 |
Median Age | 39.2 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $52,734 | $73,125 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fall river vs Pequot lakes
- In Fall river, the population is higher at 93,682, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
- The median age in Pequot lakes is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 39.2 years in Fall river.
- Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125, compared to $52,734 in Fall river.
- In Pequot lakes, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fall river.
- Fall river has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river vs Pequot lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fall river | Pequot lakes |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 68 | 94 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river vs Pequot lakes
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fall river at 6% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pequot lakes at 94% compared to 68% in Fall river.
- The Asian population is larger in Fall river at 3% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river at 12% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river at 11% compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
- In Pequot lakes, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fall river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fall river | Pequot lakes |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.5% |
Depression | 25.0% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 23.0% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 30.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river vs Pequot lakes
- More residents in Fall river report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fall river at 25.0% compared to 23.3% in Pequot lakes.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fall river at 23.0% compared to 15.2% in Pequot lakes.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 16.7% in Fall river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fall river at 32.8% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fall river at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fall river | Pequot lakes |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (2,365) | 0.7% (17) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (18,187) | 14.0% (341) |
Less than High School | 32.4% (30,324) | 3.4% (84) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (10,601) | 20.7% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river vs Pequot lakes
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
- More residents in Fall river have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
- In Pequot lakes, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 11.3% in Fall river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.