Demographics details for Fall river, MA vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river, MA vs Cincinnati, OH.
Data | Fall river | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,682 | 309,513 |
Median Age | 39.2 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $52,734 | $49,191 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Fall river vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 93,682 in Fall river.
- Residents in Fall river have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Fall river has a higher median income of $52,734 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fall river at 32.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 16% in Fall river.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 5.6% in Fall river.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fall river | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 40 |
White | 68 | 46 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 6% in Fall river.
- Fall river has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- Both Fall river and Cincinnati have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river at 12% compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river at 11% compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fall river and Cincinnati at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fall river | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.1% |
Depression | 25.0% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 23.0% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river vs Cincinnati
- More residents in Fall river report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.0% in Cincinnati.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fall river at 25.0% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fall river at 23.0% compared to 21.3% in Cincinnati.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cincinnati at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Fall river.
- Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 32.8% in Fall river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fall river at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Cincinnati.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fall river | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (2,365) | 0.9% (2,632) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (18,187) | 12.5% (38,643) |
Less than High School | 32.4% (30,324) | 9.6% (29,753) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (10,601) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river vs Cincinnati
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents in Fall river have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 9.6% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 11.3% in Fall river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.