Demographics details for Fall river, MA vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river, MA vs Central city, KY.
Data | Fall river | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,682 | 5,810 |
Median Age | 39.2 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $52,734 | $52,184 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fall river vs Central city
- In Fall river, the population is higher at 93,682, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Fall river have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Fall river has a higher median income of $52,734 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fall river.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fall river and Central city at 16%.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fall river | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 3 |
White | 68 | 88 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fall river at 6% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 68% in Fall river.
- The Asian population is larger in Fall river at 3% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river at 12% compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river at 11% compared to 6% in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fall river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fall river | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.5% |
Depression | 25.0% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 23.0% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river vs Central city
- More residents in Fall river report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 25.0% in Fall river.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 23.0% in Fall river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fall river at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 32.8% in Fall river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fall river at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fall river | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (2,365) | 1.1% (65) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (18,187) | 15.4% (897) |
Less than High School | 32.4% (30,324) | 15.6% (905) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (10,601) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Fall river have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.