Demographics details for Fall river mills, CA vs Ute, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river mills, CA vs Ute, IA.
| Data | Fall river mills | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 678 | 329 |
| Median Age | 27.7 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,827 | $51,250 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ute
- In Fall river mills, the population is higher at 678, compared to 329 in Ute.
- The median age in Ute is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 27.7 years in Fall river mills.
- Ute has a higher median income of $51,250, compared to $36,827 in Fall river mills.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fall river mills at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Ute.
- Fall river mills has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Ute.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river mills is higher at 6.0%, compared to 2.2% in Ute.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river mills vs Ute provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fall river mills | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 36 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 27 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ute
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fall river mills at 1% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ute at 99% compared to 36% in Fall river mills.
- Both Fall river mills and Ute have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river mills at 25% compared to 1% in Ute.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river mills at 27% compared to 0% in Ute.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fall river mills at 11% compared to 0% in Ute.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fall river mills | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 31.3% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ute
- More residents in Fall river mills report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Ute.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fall river mills at 21.7% compared to 19.9% in Ute.
- Ute has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.7% in Fall river mills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ute at 21.4% compared to 18.0% in Fall river mills.
- Ute has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 31.3% in Fall river mills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ute at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Fall river mills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fall river mills | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (91) | 31.0% (102) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (66) | 8.5% (28) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (33) | 7.0% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ute
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fall river mills and Ute at 0.0%.
- In Ute, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 13.4% in Fall river mills.
- More residents in Fall river mills have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 8.5% in Ute.
- In Ute, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 4.9% in Fall river mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.