Demographics details for Fall river mills, CA vs Somerton, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fall river mills, CA vs Somerton, AZ.

Data Fall river mills Somerton
Population 678 14,514
Median Age 27.7 years 30.4 years
Median Income $36,827 $64,180
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 15%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Fall river mills vs Somerton

  • The population in Somerton is higher at 14,514, compared to 678 in Fall river mills.
  • The median age in Somerton is higher at 30.4 years, compared to 27.7 years in Fall river mills.
  • Somerton has a higher median income of $64,180, compared to $36,827 in Fall river mills.
  • In Somerton, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fall river mills.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fall river mills and Somerton at 15%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fall river mills is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.5% in Somerton.

Demographics

Demographics Fall river mills vs Somerton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fall river mills Somerton
Black 1 3
White 36 -37
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 25 95
Two or More Races 27 39
American Indian 11 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Somerton

  • In Somerton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Fall river mills.
  • Fall river mills has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to -37% in Somerton.
  • Both Fall river mills and Somerton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Somerton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 25% in Fall river mills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Somerton at 39%, compared to 27% in Fall river mills.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fall river mills at 11% compared to 0% in Somerton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fall river mills Somerton
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 16.0%
Depression 21.7% 18.3%
Smoking 14.7% 16.5%
Binge Drinking 18.0% 15.1%
Obesity 31.3% 44.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Somerton

  • More residents in Fall river mills report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Somerton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fall river mills at 21.7% compared to 18.3% in Somerton.
  • Somerton has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Fall river mills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fall river mills at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Somerton.
  • Somerton has higher obesity rates at 44.4% compared to 31.3% in Fall river mills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fall river mills at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Somerton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fall river mills Somerton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.4% (498)
High School Diploma 13.4% (91) 11.2% (1,630)
Less than High School 9.7% (66) 37.3% (5,414)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.9% (33) 9.7% (1,411)

Education Levels Comparison: Fall river mills vs Somerton

  • In Somerton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Fall river mills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fall river mills hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 11.2% in Somerton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Somerton at 37.3%, compared to 9.7% in Fall river mills.
  • In Somerton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 4.9% in Fall river mills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.