Or Compare Two Places

Demographics details for Fall river mills, CA vs La crosse, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fall river mills, CA vs La crosse, WI.

Data Fall river mills La crosse
Population 678 51,380
Median Age 27.7 years 30.0 years
Median Income $36,827 $51,836
Married Families 34.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Fall river mills vs La crosse

  • The population in La crosse is higher at 51,380, compared to 678 in Fall river mills.
  • The median age in La crosse is higher at 30.0 years, compared to 27.7 years in Fall river mills.
  • La crosse has a higher median income of $51,836, compared to $36,827 in Fall river mills.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fall river mills at 34.0% compared to 26.0% in La crosse.
  • Fall river mills has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in La crosse.
  • The unemployment rate in Fall river mills is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.2% in La crosse.

Demographics

Demographics Fall river mills vs La crosse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fall river mills La crosse
Black 1 2
White 36 88
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 25 2
Two or More Races 27 4
American Indian 11 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fall river mills vs La crosse

  • In La crosse, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fall river mills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in La crosse at 88% compared to 36% in Fall river mills.
  • In La crosse, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fall river mills.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river mills at 25% compared to 2% in La crosse.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river mills at 27% compared to 4% in La crosse.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fall river mills at 11% compared to 0% in La crosse.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fall river mills La crosse
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 10.5%
Depression 21.7% 25.7%
Smoking 14.7% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 18.0% 23.1%
Obesity 31.3% 36.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river mills vs La crosse

  • More residents in Fall river mills report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in La crosse.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in La crosse at 25.7% versus 21.7% in Fall river mills.
  • La crosse has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Fall river mills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in La crosse at 23.1% compared to 18.0% in Fall river mills.
  • La crosse has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 31.3% in Fall river mills.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fall river mills and La crosse at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fall river mills La crosse
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (232)
High School Diploma 13.4% (91) 13.6% (6,986)
Less than High School 9.7% (66) 5.3% (2,721)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.9% (33) 20.8% (10,707)

Education Levels Comparison: Fall river mills vs La crosse

  • In La crosse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Fall river mills.
  • In La crosse, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 13.4% in Fall river mills.
  • More residents in Fall river mills have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 5.3% in La crosse.
  • In La crosse, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 4.9% in Fall river mills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.