Demographics details for Fall river mills, CA vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river mills, CA vs Ash fork, AZ.
Data | Fall river mills | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 678 | 466 |
Median Age | 27.7 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $36,827 | $79,861 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ash fork
- In Fall river mills, the population is higher at 678, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 27.7 years in Fall river mills.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $36,827 in Fall river mills.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fall river mills.
- Fall river mills has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river mills is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river mills vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fall river mills | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 36 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 27 | 15 |
American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fall river mills at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 36% in Fall river mills.
- Both Fall river mills and Ash fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fall river mills at 25% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fall river mills at 27% compared to 15% in Ash fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fall river mills at 11% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fall river mills | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.2% |
Depression | 21.7% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 31.3% | 30.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.9% in Fall river mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fall river mills at 21.7% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 14.7% in Fall river mills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fall river mills at 18.0% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fall river mills at 31.3% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Fall river mills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fall river mills | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (91) | 13.1% (61) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (66) | 23.6% (110) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (33) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river mills vs Ash fork
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fall river mills and Ash fork at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river mills hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 9.7% in Fall river mills.
- In Ash fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 4.9% in Fall river mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.