Demographics details for Falconer, NY vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Falconer, NY vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Falconer | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,262 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 46.4 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,625 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Falconer vs Ephrata
- The population in Ephrata is higher at 8,476, compared to 2,262 in Falconer.
- Residents in Falconer have a higher median age of 46.4 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $50,625 in Falconer.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Falconer at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 10% in Falconer.
- The unemployment rate in Falconer is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Falconer vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Falconer | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 99 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Falconer vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Falconer.
- Falconer has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Falconer and Ephrata have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Falconer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 1% in Falconer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Falconer and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Falconer | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Falconer vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Falconer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 26.7% in Falconer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Falconer at 21.4% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Falconer at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Obesity rates are higher in Falconer at 36.5% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Falconer at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Falconer | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (458) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (294) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (237) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Falconer vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Falconer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falconer hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 13.0% in Falconer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Falconer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.