Demographics details for Fairview, TN vs Cottage grove, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairview, TN vs Cottage grove, MN.
Data | Fairview | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,910 | 41,033 |
Median Age | 34.9 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $82,344 | $117,673 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Fairview vs Cottage grove
- The population in Cottage grove is higher at 41,033, compared to 9,910 in Fairview.
- The median age in Cottage grove is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 34.9 years in Fairview.
- Cottage grove has a higher median income of $117,673, compared to $82,344 in Fairview.
- In Cottage grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Fairview.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairview and Cottage grove at 5%.
- Cottage grove has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.1% in Fairview.
Demographics
Demographics Fairview vs Cottage grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairview | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 6 |
White | 75 | 77 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairview vs Cottage grove
- In Cottage grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Fairview.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cottage grove at 77% compared to 75% in Fairview.
- In Cottage grove, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Fairview.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairview at 12% compared to 5% in Cottage grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview at 8% compared to 6% in Cottage grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview and Cottage grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairview | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 13.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 7.8% |
Depression | 26.5% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 21.6% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 31.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview vs Cottage grove
- More residents in Fairview report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.4% in Cottage grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairview at 26.5% compared to 22.5% in Cottage grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairview at 18.2% compared to 13.2% in Cottage grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cottage grove at 21.6% compared to 16.5% in Fairview.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairview at 31.4% compared to 31.3% in Cottage grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairview at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Cottage grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairview | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (134) | 1.1% (445) |
High School Diploma | 14.1% (1,402) | 12.5% (5,134) |
Less than High School | 8.8% (868) | 4.8% (1,981) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (2,169) | 24.1% (9,896) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairview vs Cottage grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Cottage grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview hold a high school diploma at 14.1% compared to 12.5% in Cottage grove.
- More residents in Fairview have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 4.8% in Cottage grove.
- In Cottage grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 21.9% in Fairview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.