Demographics details for Fairview, TN vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairview, TN vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Fairview | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,910 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $82,344 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairview vs Beaver dam
- The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 9,910 in Fairview.
- The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 34.9 years in Fairview.
- Fairview has a higher median income of $82,344 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairview at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- Fairview has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fairview and Beaver dam at 3.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Fairview vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairview | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 75 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairview vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairview at 4% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 75% in Fairview.
- In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Fairview.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairview at 12% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview at 8% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairview | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 31.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Fairview report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairview at 26.5% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairview at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 16.5% in Fairview.
- Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.4% in Fairview.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairview and Beaver dam at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairview | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (134) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (1,402) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (868) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (2,169) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairview vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 14.1% in Fairview.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 8.8% in Fairview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.