Demographics details for Fairview heights, IL vs Rosedale, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairview heights, IL vs Rosedale, MD.

Data Fairview heights Rosedale
Population 16,324 20,058
Median Age 40.0 years 40.9 years
Median Income $74,038 $81,297
Married Families 36.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Fairview heights vs Rosedale

  • The population in Rosedale is higher at 20,058, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
  • The median age in Rosedale is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 40.0 years in Fairview heights.
  • Rosedale has a higher median income of $81,297, compared to $74,038 in Fairview heights.
  • In Rosedale, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fairview heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rosedale at 10%, compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • Rosedale has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Fairview heights vs Rosedale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairview heights Rosedale
Black 30 41
White 54 38
Asian 1 6
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races 12 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Rosedale

  • In Rosedale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 30% in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 38% in Rosedale.
  • In Rosedale, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Fairview heights.
  • Rosedale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview heights at 12% compared to 7% in Rosedale.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview heights and Rosedale at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairview heights Rosedale
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 9.8%
Depression 19.0% 22.2%
Smoking 15.5% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 15.2%
Obesity 42.1% 38.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Rosedale

  • In Rosedale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rosedale at 22.2% versus 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fairview heights at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Rosedale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Rosedale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairview heights at 42.1% compared to 38.2% in Rosedale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairview heights at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Rosedale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairview heights Rosedale
No Schooling 1.0% (168) 1.3% (262)
High School Diploma 14.5% (2,359) 19.8% (3,973)
Less than High School 7.3% (1,187) 11.8% (2,371)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (3,596) 16.3% (3,271)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairview heights vs Rosedale

  • In Rosedale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Fairview heights.
  • In Rosedale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosedale at 11.8%, compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 16.3% in Rosedale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.