Demographics details for Fairview heights, IL vs Irvine, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairview heights, IL vs Irvine, CA.
Data | Fairview heights | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,324 | 313,685 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 33.8 years |
Median Income | $74,038 | $122,948 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairview heights vs Irvine
- The population in Irvine is higher at 313,685, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
- Residents in Fairview heights have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948, compared to $74,038 in Fairview heights.
- In Irvine, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fairview heights.
- Fairview heights has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Irvine.
- The unemployment rate in Fairview heights is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Irvine.
Demographics
Demographics Fairview heights vs Irvine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairview heights | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 2 |
White | 54 | 34 |
Asian | 1 | 43 |
Hispanic | 3 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Irvine
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairview heights at 30% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- Fairview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 34% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, the Asian population stands at 43%, greater than 1% in Fairview heights.
- Irvine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview heights at 12% compared to 10% in Irvine.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview heights and Irvine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairview heights | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 7.7% |
Depression | 19.0% | 15.4% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 7.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 42.1% | 21.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Irvine
- More residents in Fairview heights report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairview heights at 19.0% compared to 15.4% in Irvine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairview heights at 15.5% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairview heights at 42.1% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairview heights at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairview heights | Irvine |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (168) | 0.8% (2,579) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (2,359) | 3.8% (12,010) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (1,187) | 3.4% (10,664) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (3,596) | 44.3% (138,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairview heights vs Irvine
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Irvine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- More residents in Fairview heights have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 22.0% in Fairview heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.