Demographics details for Fairview heights, IL vs Hobbs, NM

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairview heights, IL vs Hobbs, NM.

Data Fairview heights Hobbs
Population 16,324 39,648
Median Age 40.0 years 30.8 years
Median Income $74,038 $63,804
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Fairview heights vs Hobbs

  • The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
  • Residents in Fairview heights have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038 compared to $63,804 in Hobbs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairview heights at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Hobbs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Fairview heights vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairview heights Hobbs
Black 30 6
White 54 4
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 3 63
Two or More Races 12 25
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Hobbs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairview heights at 30% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
  • Fairview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
  • Both Fairview heights and Hobbs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 12% in Fairview heights.
  • In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairview heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairview heights Hobbs
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 13.3%
Depression 19.0% 20.6%
Smoking 15.5% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 15.4%
Obesity 42.1% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Hobbs

  • In Hobbs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hobbs at 20.6% versus 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Hobbs has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 15.4% in Hobbs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairview heights at 42.1% compared to 41.7% in Hobbs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairview heights at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairview heights Hobbs
No Schooling 1.0% (168) 2.2% (856)
High School Diploma 14.5% (2,359) 15.9% (6,312)
Less than High School 7.3% (1,187) 26.2% (10,381)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (3,596) 9.2% (3,667)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairview heights vs Hobbs

  • In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Fairview heights.
  • In Hobbs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.