Demographics details for Fairport, NY vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairport, NY vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Fairport | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,381 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $95,354 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairport vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 5,381 in Fairport.
- Residents in Fairport have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Fairport has a higher median income of $95,354 compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairport at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 5% in Fairport.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.1% in Fairport.
Demographics
Demographics Fairport vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairport | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 90 | -9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairport vs Shafter
- In Shafter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fairport.
- Fairport has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairport.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 3% in Fairport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 6% in Fairport.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairport | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 28.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairport vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.5% in Fairport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairport at 28.0% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Fairport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairport at 18.5% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 28.4% in Fairport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairport at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairport | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (44) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 5.2% (280) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (424) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.4% (2,550) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairport vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Fairport.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 5.2% in Fairport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 7.9% in Fairport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.4% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.